dc.contributor.author | Zalewska, Anna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T08:51:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T08:51:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Forum Psychologiczne 1999, T. 4, nr 2, s. 138-155 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/770 | |
dc.description.abstract | 97 bank workers (aged 20-55) were investigated with: Neuberger and Allerbeck's
"Work Description Inventory" (life satisfaction), Brandstaetter's "Time Sampling Diary" (importance of motives, and happiness), Seifert and Bergmann's "Work Values Orientation” (importance of values). Four types of well-being (Winners, Sufferers, Aspirants, and Frustrates) are distinguished on the basis of a level of life satisfaction and happiness. The links of the types with valuation system are examined. The results show that a structure of valuation system depends on the types of well-being. The types affect a level of: Achievement and Social Power motive importance, Achievement and Affiliation value importance, as well as value-motive congruence in the two last valuation domains. Most differences appear between Aspirants and Sufferers. Four types of well-being manifest different Achievement value-motive relations what leads to a reflection that the types of well-being are mostly conditioned by value-motive relations in the Achievement domain. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | pl | en_US |
dc.publisher | Instytut Psychologii ; Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna w Bydgoszczy | en_US |
dc.title | Typy zadowolenia z życia a system wartościowania | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Types of well-being and evaluation system | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |