DSpace Repository

Czy praca historyka jest złudzeniem?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kosnarewicz, Elwira
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-12T11:02:48Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-12T11:02:48Z
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.identifier.citation Forum Psychologiczne 1997, T. 2, nr 2, s. 57-62 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/728
dc.description.abstract The author claims that there are not pure historica1 facts; there are only interpretations of these facts. The paper describes three interpretations of a fragment of Julian Ochorowicz's scientific biography. A question arises if the fact that something has been interpreted from various points of view means that it has been interpreted properly? Perhaps, we deceive ourselves that we have managed to reconstruct past. Apparently, the theory of interpretation can only question the sense of the historian's work. en_US
dc.language.iso pl en_US
dc.publisher Instytut Psychologii ; Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna w Bydgoszczy en_US
dc.title Czy praca historyka jest złudzeniem? en_US
dc.title.alternative Is the historian's work illusory? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record