Streszczenie
This paper uses the case of Kyrgyz Republic to analyze two
competing views concerning the role of the Eurasian Economic Union
(EAEU). The realist view claims that the EAEU is a tool of Russian
hegemonic power over its region of influence and interprets is as a primarily political rather than economic organization designed to serve
Russia’s national interests at the expense of those of other members. The
liberal institutionalist view, on the other hand, sees the EAEU as a new
regional organization of economic integration that is beneficial for all
members. Analyzing the case of the participation of the Kyrgyz Republic
in this union makes it clear that it is still too early to determine which
perspective is correct as there is evidence in support of both.