dc.contributor.author | Kaczmarek, Bożydar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-13T08:40:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-13T08:40:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Forum Psychologiczne 1998, T. 3, nr 1, s. 3-17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/742 | |
dc.description.abstract | We are apt to compare our brain to the most advanced technological devices we know. No wonder a computer is the most common candidate to represent the human brain. The paper shows that such a metaphor is of not very helpful due to the basic differences in the ways our and the computer operate. First of all, the computer works in accordance wit h strict algorithmic rules, while the mind uses heuristic strategies which take into account a probability of occurrence of events in question. The characteristics of our brain action finds its reflection in language. Accordingly, our verbal utterances are as a rule figurative, illogical and unpredictable. At the same time, it is pointed out that each human being is a highly emotive and hence unpredictable creature which provides for his/her unique nature and stands in sharp contrast with the most elaborated computer. Examples illustrating the above assumptions are given in the text. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | pl | en_US |
dc.publisher | Instytut Psychologii ; Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna w Bydgoszczy | en_US |
dc.title | Człowiek Turinga czy człowiek naturalny? | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Turing's or natural man? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |