dc.contributor.author | Laska, Artur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-04T12:39:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-04T12:39:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Świat Idei i Polityki 2006, Tom 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/4469 | |
dc.description.abstract | All revolutions and wars were conducted to build a just order, and both followers of the new deal vision and those who defended the old one wished to realize the idea. As a result, the logical concept of social justice appears to be extremely difficult. Considering all categories constituting a political discussion, the concept seems to be one of the most significant but obscure. That is why it should be considered as "truly disputable". The intensity of such a normatively neutral and non-justifying thesis is based on the conviction that no interpretation is better than any other. Its weakness also amounts to assuming that there exists a permanent disagreement within a political discourse, which, as experts say, would make the functioning of the society impossible. Therefore, the author presents his own suggestion of a complex and coherent definition that may be used as theoretical foundation for analyzing political deliberation on this disputable in its essence category. | |
dc.language.iso | pl | en_US |
dc.publisher | Instytut Nauk Politycznych UKW | en_US |
dc.title | Sprawiedliwość społeczna jako „pojęcie przygodnie sporne” | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Social justice as „a casually disputable concept” | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |