Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorŁukasiewicz, Dariusz
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-06T12:54:10Z
dc.date.available2014-05-06T12:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationEtyka 2004, nr 37, s. 215-226en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/471
dc.description.abstractThe paper deals with some ambiguities in Twardowski's account of ethics. The author focuses on finding more accurate interpretation of Twardowski's views on values. In )1is attempt at fulfilling the task author quotes and later comments on some ways of understanding Twardowski's views. His major concern is with answering the question whether Twardowski finds value (good) a specific feature of an object, or rather its mode of being. He also considers the consequences of Twardowski's standpoint about the kind of feature value represents. According to the author most difficulties in Twardowski's conception have been interestingly resolved by Tadeusz Czeżowski, whom he finds the most original successor of Twardowski's beliefs, especially on objectivity of good, philosophical independence from religions etc.en_US
dc.language.isoplen_US
dc.subjectMetaetykaen_US
dc.subjectKazimierz Twardowskien_US
dc.titleKilka uwag do metaetycznych poglądów Kazimierza Twardowskiegoen_US
dc.title.alternativeSome comments on metaethical views of Kazimierz Twardowskien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord