DSpace Repository

O krytyce determinizmu i logice wielowartościowej Jana Łukasiewicza

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Łukasiewicz, Dariusz
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-05T12:30:49Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-05T12:30:49Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Studia z Filozofii Polskiej 2011, nr 6, s. 13-24 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1897-8584
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/470
dc.description.abstract The article focuses on Jan Łukasiewicz’s thesis that the truth or falsity of some propositions about the future – future contingents – entails determinism. According to Łukasiewicz, determinism could be avoided by rejecting the classical logic (two-valued logic) and replacing it with many-valued logic (three-valued logic). Łukasiewicz’s position is taken under the examination from the point of view of Susan Haack’s thesis. In her opinion, the truth values of future contingents do not entail any determinism. I argue in the paper that Haack’s view is incorrect because it does not take into account all the premises accepted by Łukasiewicz. The most important of them concern the semantics of future verbs. Łukasiewicz, as I try to show, assumes the so called Peircean semantics and not the Ockhamist one. Next, I try to argue that it is possible to preserve the validity of Łukasiewicz’s reasoning, which led him to the three-valued logic by taking into account his assumptions regarding the meaning of future verbs. en_US
dc.language.iso pl en_US
dc.title O krytyce determinizmu i logice wielowartościowej Jana Łukasiewicza en_US
dc.title.alternative On critique of determinism and multi-quality of Jan Łukasiewicz en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record