DSpace Repository

Autobiografizm(y) Miłosza - metody badań, konflikty interpretacji

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pokrywka, Rafał
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-10T12:33:33Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-10T12:33:33Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Świat i Słowo 2015, nr 2, s. 135-145. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/3853
dc.description.abstract The popular usage of the terms „autobiographism” and „autobiographical” in numerous papers on the work by Czesław Miłosz suggests that there is a general consensus about their meaning. Yet there are many meanings as well as many methods of researching into the autobiographical element: the immanent, the declarative, the referential, the intertextual, the autobiographical pact and the phantasm. Every of these approaches situates the research in one of the great paradigms of literary studies, first of all within the opposition of hermeneutics and deconstruction. Professional Miłosz studies tend to ignore these distinctions. Thus the assertion of their discursive character seems questionable. en_US
dc.language.iso pl en_US
dc.subject Czesław Miłosz en_US
dc.subject autobiographism en_US
dc.subject autobiography en_US
dc.subject discourse en_US
dc.subject hermeneutics en_US
dc.subject deconstruction en_US
dc.subject intention en_US
dc.subject autobiografizm en_US
dc.subject autobiografia en_US
dc.subject dyskurs en_US
dc.subject hermeneutyka en_US
dc.subject dekonstrukcja en_US
dc.subject intencja en_US
dc.title Autobiografizm(y) Miłosza - metody badań, konflikty interpretacji en_US
dc.title.alternative Milosz’s autobiographism(s) - methods of analysis, conflicts of interpretations en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record