<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Świat Idei i Polityki, 2006, Tom 6</title>
<link href="https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4153" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4153</id>
<updated>2026-04-21T05:59:18Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T05:59:18Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Metodologiczne podstawy współczesnej teorii politycznej</title>
<link href="https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4473" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nocoń, Jarosław</name>
</author>
<id>https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4473</id>
<updated>2017-12-13T13:52:46Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Metodologiczne podstawy współczesnej teorii politycznej
Nocoń, Jarosław
The above outline of the research paradigms occurring in modern theories does not exhaust a variety of methodological approaches found in modern political theory. The article presents mainly paradigms of modern theory inter alia neofunctional, neoinstitutional, postbehavioral concept and also politics in the game theory perspective. It only concerns lines strictly connected with analyticalempirical theories. The problem of methodological foundations of normative theories is, however, very difficult to present. Although the researches noticed a necessity for their existence and development, the issue of rational justification of axiological opinions is still open. A lot of space is created to inspire the formation of political science metatheory base, not excluding referring to classical philosophy.&#13;
At present it is difficult to explicitly identify philosophical and methodological foundations of the normative political theory. One may find reference to many different lines, from Thomism to sceptical conservatism and a variety of problems concerning hermeneutics and phenomenology. From the pos-positivistic point of view, ontological inspirations of the normative political theory in particular belong to metaphysics. For this reason the normative theory contributed little to empirical methodology. It is preferable to refer to genetic explanation, generalization and pre-scriptive monographic forms.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fundamentalizm muzułmański jako ruch społeczny</title>
<link href="https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4472" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Manikowski, Sławomir</name>
</author>
<id>https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4472</id>
<updated>2017-12-13T13:53:10Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Fundamentalizm muzułmański jako ruch społeczny
Manikowski, Sławomir
Muslim fundamentalism is not only a religious but also a social and political phenomenon. Political science considers it both a political ideology and a social movement. Since we have been observing an increase in its popularity for a few dozen years, it is worth considering what makes a lot of Muslims follow this fundamentalistic ideology.&#13;
The author tries to answer the questions: who an average fundamentalist is, what education he obtained and what attracts him to the fundamentalistic movement.&#13;
The author also describes the social basis of fundamentalism, which will permit us to find why this ideology is so popular. The author considers poverty as a catalysing factor but he also points to transformations in Muslim societies concerning modernity, such as globalisation, political centralisation, urbanisation, massmedia widespreading, or migrations. Neither does he miss antiAmericanism as an important mobilising factor.&#13;
The other part of this paper concerns the so called "Muslim terrorism" and its relationship with fundamentalism. The author takes note of the necessity to differentiate between the both concepts and presents the two streams of fundamentalism: terrorist (salafijja dżihadu) and "peaceful".
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Socjologia wiedzy jako perspektywa badawcza w analizie interpretacji wzorca programowego</title>
<link href="https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4471" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sujecki, Janusz</name>
</author>
<id>https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4471</id>
<updated>2017-12-13T13:53:31Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Socjologia wiedzy jako perspektywa badawcza w analizie interpretacji wzorca programowego
Sujecki, Janusz
Transformation of the political system in Poland has created a new friendly environment for the research on the history of social movements, including socialistic program, formulated basing on Marxism. The lack of any ideological pressure and censorship restrictions formed particularly advantageous circumstances for the researchers interested in the history of the socialistic concept. Today one can consider whether the opportunity which appeared by vanishing the ideological corset has been used properly. In the 1990s, the former approach, usually coming down to treating Marxism as religious dogma, was replaced by negation mostly resulting in the elimination of the issue itself. You could observe a tendency to avoid the research on the history of socialistic concept, so necessary after decades of barriers, resulting in passing over in silence or misrepresentations.&#13;
The foregoing considerations show vital stages of the process of forming program interpretations created basing on Marxism. However, the presented here schematic depiction may also be useful for demonstrating the process of formulating the program constructed as one of a few variants of any doctrine, i.e. a pattern. The choice of Marxism as a program pattern is only a consequence of referring to an instance of the hagiography of the Polish socialistic movement and is strictly related to my interests concerning the history of the Polish socialistic concept. I regard the suggestions presented here as my voice in the discussion lasting since 1990 on the use of research abilities being a result of the political system transformation in Poland.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Wolność jako główne kryterium tworzenia instytucji demokratycznego państwa prawnego w myśli Józefa Tischnera</title>
<link href="https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4470" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rogowski, Waldemar</name>
</author>
<id>https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl///handle/item/4470</id>
<updated>2017-12-13T13:53:56Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Wolność jako główne kryterium tworzenia instytucji demokratycznego państwa prawnego w myśli Józefa Tischnera
Rogowski, Waldemar
Retrospective consideration of the priest Józef Tischner.s writing permits us to describe him as a philosopher of liberty. He considered this idea as a determinant of humanity and a basis of creating a new political realty during the political system transformation. At the same time the idea of liberty as a fundamental value shaping a sense of a human being.s dignity was a subject of lively discussions. Concepts clashing with each other presented this idea in different ways. There appeared opinions absolutising a human being.s liberty with reference to individualism which derived from the tradition of J. Locke.s classical liberalism. In turn, others indicated that man should restrict his freedom for the sake of communitaristic superiority of common good over the individual one. Other opinions warned against freedom as an unfortunate gift that would destroy a human being.&#13;
Tischner based his view of freedom on personalism and courageously propagated a necessity of using it to form institutions of a democratic legal state. His critical look at new political subjects and institutions as well as on a changing role of the Catholic Church is essential in this paper.&#13;
The timeless character of Tischner.s proposals or suggestions in the issues of institutions or political systems is still open and may be used as an important voice in a discourse concerning the directions of political transformation.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
