Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorLaska, Artur
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-04T12:39:41Z
dc.date.available2017-10-04T12:39:41Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationŚwiat Idei i Polityki 2006, Tom 6.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/4469
dc.description.abstractAll revolutions and wars were conducted to build a just order, and both followers of the new deal vision and those who defended the old one wished to realize the idea. As a result, the logical concept of social justice appears to be extremely difficult. Considering all categories constituting a political discussion, the concept seems to be one of the most significant but obscure. That is why it should be considered as "truly disputable". The intensity of such a normatively neutral and non-justifying thesis is based on the conviction that no interpretation is better than any other. Its weakness also amounts to assuming that there exists a permanent disagreement within a political discourse, which, as experts say, would make the functioning of the society impossible. Therefore, the author presents his own suggestion of a complex and coherent definition that may be used as theoretical foundation for analyzing political deliberation on this disputable in its essence category.
dc.language.isoplen_US
dc.publisherInstytut Nauk Politycznych UKWen_US
dc.titleSprawiedliwość społeczna jako „pojęcie przygodnie sporne”en_US
dc.title.alternativeSocial justice as „a casually disputable concept”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord